Global Alpha Paris-Aligned
All investment strategies have the potential for profit and loss, your or your clients’ capital may be at risk. Past performance is not a guide to future returns.
The Global Alpha Team recently launched a lower carbon variant of the core model, named Global Alpha Paris-Aligned. This portfolio offers a pathway for clients to align their assets with the objectives of the Paris Agreement.
In this paper, the first of many we hope to share with you, we provide some background to the Paris Accords and outline how we seek to implement its objectives into Global Alpha Paris-Aligned.
Understanding the Paris Agreement
The Paris Agreement is arguably the most important global treaty of our generation. It is the first to bring about a universal multilateral agreement on climate action. At its heart, the treaty seeks to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change by holding the increase in global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and pursue efforts to limit that increase to 1.5°C.
It is important to remember that the Paris Agreement was mainly about agreeing on the temperature goals. Decisions about the exact rules of the game and what position everyone should play were left until later as the arguments would have sunk the agreement. The real breakthrough lay in the significance of all nations agreeing that a) there is such a thing as a ‘dangerous’ level of climate change and b) every effort should be made to stay beneath it. While the ambition is clear, how we are to get there is much less so.
Since the Paris Agreement was signed in 2015, more work has gone into identifying potential pathways for reducing emissions at speeds consistent with hitting those temperature targets. It has become clear that there is a significant difference between 1.5°C and 2°C, both in terms of the pace of emissions reduction required and in the severity of impact on society and the environment. In 2018, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) issued a special report which included compelling evidence that the world should aim for 1.5°C as the impacts are disproportionately worse at 2°C. For example, the proportion of people exposed to severe heat is 2.6 times greater in a 2°C world than a 1.5°C one, ice-free Arctic summers are up to 10 times more likely, and species loss is 2–3 times worse in a 2°C world.
The path to ‘net zero’
Carbon dioxide (CO2 ) is the most important of the greenhouse gasses, accounting for around three quarters of emissions. Since the start of the industrial revolution, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has risen rapidly and has already caused temperatures to rise by at least 1°C. Because CO2 can linger in the atmosphere for hundreds of years, there is a delay between our actions and our planet’s reactions, meaning that more warming is already locked in. The Paris Agreement effectively requires humanity to think in terms of a ‘carbon budget’ – the maximum amount of carbon we can emit if we are to remain within the temperature goals. The best estimates are that we can emit about another 420 gigatons of CO2 and stay under 1.5°C. Given that current annual CO2 emissions are around 40 gigatons, we need to take urgent action to reduce our global emissions, ultimately reaching ‘net zero’, where the volume of emissions released into the atmosphere is equal to the volume removed in the same year.
To help provide guidance to policymakers, the UN and IPCC have laid out what a plausible net zero pathway might look like at the global level. The best estimates suggest we need to halve our global emissions by 2030, ultimately reaching net zero by 2050. But it is important to note that these are averages. Not everyone will move at the same pace. The level of reductions will vary by country, by industry, by company, and even by individual. Under the Paris Agreement, all countries must submit their own Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), outlining how far they intend to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Countries will reach peak emissions at different times, and will follow different pathways to emissions reduction, based on what is feasible and equitable. For every country that cannot reach those milestones, others must do so even faster if the overall global target is to be reached.
The role of financial markets
Financial markets have an important role to play in this transition. We have great capacity to affect change. One of the biggest barriers to a more rapid response to the problem of climate change is human behaviour. When confronted with trade-offs between the present and the future, we almost always overvalue the present at the expense of the future. It is for this reason that Mark Carney, former Governor of the Bank of England, dubbed climate change the “Tragedy of the Horizon”, as its most catastrophic impacts will be felt beyond the traditional horizons of most people. Financial markets can address this issue at the economic level. They can pull forward future considerations by repricing assets that are most at risk. They can then redirect capital from the companies facing the greatest risk to those that are leading the decarbonisation of our economy.
The finance industry also has an important role to play in holding companies to a higher standard of transparency and accountability. We cannot manage what we cannot measure. Shareholders can put pressure on companies to measure and publish information about their climate footprint. This would improve our collective understanding and inform policymakers’ decision making. Armed with this information, shareholders can also hold companies accountable to the pledges made under the Paris Agreement.
Finally, the finance industry can offer alternative investment approaches, ones that align with our society’s need to transition to a zero carbon future. Making these products accessible will make it easier for savers to vote with their savings. This isn’t about offering ‘low carbon’, but an equitable transition pathway towards net-zero emissions. Some high-emission companies are important solution providers and excluding these companies on emissions alone risks advancing a pathway that is inequitable or simply unviable.
Our take on Paris Alignment
First, Paris-Alignment cannot be reduced to a number. Implementation of the Paris Agreement requires a thoughtful and coordinated economic and social transformation. Reductionist approaches that distil businesses down to a single carbon metric risk losing important context. For example, the rush to divest businesses based on carbon metrics could be counter-productive to decarbonisation efforts, as a large proportion of global emission sources lack economically viable solutions. These industries require investment, not divestment. That some firms pollute more than others is a mostly meaningless observation. An equitable and just transition necessitates looking at companies through a qualitative lens.
Second, being Paris-Aligned means aligning with a long-term objective, not the current state of play. We expect to hold ourselves to account by demonstrating a reduction in portfolio carbon intensity over time. However, we do not hold ourselves to annual reduction targets, as these are inconsistent with our investment horizon. Being Paris-Aligned is not just about managing downside risk. We need to retain the flexibility to deploy capital to businesses that are fostering change, some of whom may be significant emitters.
Finally, we wish to embrace the Paris Agreement’s mantra of the ‘highest possible ambition.’ Merely having a lower carbon exposure than that of the broader market is insufficient. We must ask, and try to answer, the hard questions. We must acknowledge that this is a dynamic and fast-moving area. We must be open minded to evolving our approach to reflect the best available science. The cumulative nature of global emissions means that the 2020s must be the decisive decade of progress and action.
How do we do it?
Global Alpha Paris-Aligned applies a two-stage process to negotiate the pathway to net zero. The first stage is a quantitative screen that strips out companies engaged in both fossil fuel exploration and production as well as service provision to the sector. Appropriate revenue thresholds are used to allow for the inclusion of businesses engaged in a transformational pivot to renewable energy.
The second stage is where we subject our highest emitting holdings to a proprietary qualitative 3-question analysis. We look at the balance between vital and discretionary emissions, the viability of emission reduction pathways and management’s appetite to truly embrace the low carbon transition. We use frameworks such as the Financial Stability Board Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and the Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) to assist our process. And various data providers aid the work with scenario analysis. But fundamentally this is a qualitative endeavour, seeking to reach a well-balanced objective view on whether the company in question is part of the problem, or part of the solution.
We look forward to sharing more details on our process with you over the coming months. But for now, a concluding thought. As already mentioned, the 2020s must be the decisive decade of progress and action. The starting gun will likely be fired at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Glasgow (COP26), this November. While much of the rhetoric will focus on NDCs, there will unquestionably be greater discussion on the need for asset owners to align their funds to a 1.5°C warming scenario. Given this backdrop, Global Alpha Paris-Aligned offers a thoughtful and equitable way for our clients to truly embrace the low carbon transition.
The views expressed in this article are those of the Global Alpha Team and should not be considered as advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a particular investment. They reflect personal opinion and should not be taken as statements of fact nor should any reliance be placed on them when making investment decisions.
This communication was produced and approved in April 2021 and has not been updated subsequently. It represents views held at the time of writing and may not reflect current thinking.
Potential for Profit and Loss
All investment strategies have the potential for profit and loss, your or your clients’ capital may be at risk. Past performance is not a guide to future returns.
Any stock examples and images used in this article are not intended to represent recommendations to buy or sell, neither is it implied that they will prove profitable in the future. It is not known whether they will feature in any future portfolio produced by us. Any individual examples will represent only a small part of the overall portfolio and are inserted purely to help illustrate our investment style.
This article contains information on investments which does not constitute independent research. Accordingly, it is not subject to the protections afforded to independent research, but is classified as advertising under Art 68 of the Financial Services Act (‘FinSA’) and Baillie Gifford and its staff may have dealt in the investments concerned.
All information is sourced from Baillie Gifford & Co and is current unless otherwise stated.
The images used in this article are for illustrative purposes only.
Baillie Gifford & Co and Baillie Gifford & Co Limited are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Baillie Gifford & Co Limited is an Authorised Corporate Director of OEICs.
Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited provides investment management and advisory services to non-UK Professional/Institutional clients only. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford & Co. Baillie Gifford & Co and Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited are authorised and regulated by the FCA in the UK.
Persons resident or domiciled outside the UK should consult with their professional advisers as to whether they require any governmental or other consents in order to enable them to invest, and with their tax advisers for advice relevant to their own particular circumstances.
Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited provides investment management and advisory services to European (excluding UK) clients. It was incorporated in Ireland in May 2018 and is authorised by the Central Bank of Ireland. Through its MiFID passport, it has established Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited (Frankfurt Branch) to market its investment management and advisory services and distribute Baillie Gifford Worldwide Funds plc in Germany. Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited also has a representative office in Zurich, Switzerland pursuant to Art. 58 of the Federal Act on Financial Institutions ("FinIA"). It does not constitute a branch and therefore does not have authority to commit Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited. It is the intention to ask for the authorisation by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) to maintain this representative office of a foreign asset manager of collective assets in Switzerland pursuant to the applicable transitional provisions of FinIA. Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited, which is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford & Co.
Baillie Gifford Asia (Hong Kong) Limited 柏基亞洲(香港)有限公司 is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited and holds a Type 1 and a Type 2 licence from the Securities & Futures Commission of Hong Kong to market and distribute Baillie Gifford’s range of collective investment schemes to professional investors in Hong Kong. Baillie Gifford Asia (Hong Kong) Limited 柏基亞洲(香港)有限公司 can be contacted at Room 3009-3010, One International Finance Centre, 1 Harbour View Street, Central, Hong Kong. Telephone +852 3756 5700.
Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is licensed with the Financial Services Commission in South Korea as a cross border Discretionary Investment Manager and Non-discretionary Investment Adviser.
Mitsubishi UFJ Baillie Gifford Asset Management Limited (‘MUBGAM’) is a joint venture company between Mitsubishi UFJ Trust & Banking Corporation and Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited. MUBGAM is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
This material is provided on the basis that you are a wholesale client as defined within s761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited (ARBN 118 567 178) is registered as a foreign company under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). It is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian Financial Services License under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in respect of these financial services provided to Australian wholesale clients. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority under UK laws which differ from those applicable in Australia.
Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is registered as a Foreign Financial Services Provider with the Financial Sector Conduct Authority in South Africa.
Baillie Gifford International LLC is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited; it was formed in Delaware in 2005 and is registered with the SEC. It is the legal entity through which Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited provides client service and marketing functions in North America. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is registered with the SEC in the United States of America.
The Manager is not resident in Canada, its head office and principal place of business is in Edinburgh, Scotland. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is regulated in Canada as a portfolio manager and exempt market dealer with the Ontario Securities Commission ('OSC'). Its portfolio manager licence is currently passported into Alberta, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Newfoundland & Labrador whereas the exempt market dealer licence is passported across all Canadian provinces and territories. Baillie Gifford International LLC is regulated by the OSC as an exempt market and its licence is passported across all Canadian provinces and territories. Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited (‘BGE’) relies on the International Investment Fund Manager Exemption in the provinces of Ontario and Quebec.
Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited (“BGO”) neither has a registered business presence nor a representative office in Oman and does not undertake banking business or provide financial services in Oman. Consequently, BGO is not regulated by either the Central Bank of Oman or Oman’s Capital Market Authority. No authorization, licence or approval has been received from the Capital Market Authority of Oman or any other regulatory authority in Oman, to provide such advice or service within Oman. BGO does not solicit business in Oman and does not market, offer, sell or distribute any financial or investment products or services in Oman and no subscription to any securities, products or financial services may or will be consummated within Oman. The recipient of this document represents that it is a financial institution or a sophisticated investor (as described in Article 139 of the Executive Regulations of the Capital Market Law) and that its officers/employees have such experience in business and financial matters that they are capable of evaluating the merits and risks of investments.
This strategy is only being offered to a limited number of investors who are willing and able to conduct an independent investigation of the risks involved. This does not constitute an offer to the public and is for the use only of the named addressee and should not be given or shown to any other person (other than employees, agents, or consultants in connection with the addressee’s consideration thereof). Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited has not been and will not be registered with Qatar Central Bank or under any laws of the State of Qatar. No transactions will be concluded in your jurisdiction and any inquiries regarding the strategy should be made to Baillie Gifford.
Baillie Gifford Overseas is not licensed under Israel’s Regulation of Investment Advising, Investment Marketing and Portfolio Management Law, 5755-1995 (the Advice Law) and does not carry insurance pursuant to the Advice Law. This document is only intended for those categories of Israeli residents who are qualified clients listed on the First Addendum to the Advice Law.
52017 PRO AR 0173
YOU MAY ALSO LIKEInsights.Visit Baillie Gifford's Insights page.The second deep transition: Johan Schot's theory of radical changeWhy a ‘deep transition’ may have started to deliver a more sustainable age.Living Longer: Can We Afford It?More of us are living longer, staying healthier for longer and working for longer. What are the implications for investing and financing this longer life? Listen to Baillie Gifford’s Steven Hay to find out.A gallery for growthMuch like an art curator, the role of the investment manager involves carefully selecting investments that will make a mark and grow in value over time.