The real case for investing in China.
A unique set of circumstances has made Chinese firms highly receptive to change. As emerging market equity specialist Andrew Keiller explains, that can make them more innovative as well as among the biggest winners.
Turmoil in China’s markets has caused some to question the wisdom of owning stakes in its companies. But we believe there is still a very positive case to do so.
“To understand what’s powering the global rise of Chinese companies, we need to recognise that China now has at its disposal a resource that no other country has: a vast population that has lived through unprecedented amounts of change and, consequently, has developed an astonishing propensity for adopting and adapting to innovations, at a speed and scale that is unmatched elsewhere on earth.”
There are tens of thousands of results on Amazon UK when we search for books on how to manage change. Most of these books are designed to help us beat away resistance to change; how do we get rid of the phrase “because we’ve always done it like that”? I’d suggest there’s a good chance you’ve heard it used – or even used it yourself – in the workplace in the past year. I know I’m guilty…
In the UK, changes in our physical setting or probably even more so in our mental models, are very often met with huge resistance, especially when we don’t make the active decision ourselves. Maybe the change isn’t justified properly? Maybe we’re just creatures of habit? Or maybe we feel threatened in some instances? If we broaden our horizons though, we quickly understand this is far from the same everywhere.
China is one of the most interesting cases in openness to change. I don’t bring this up simply due to the regulatory change that companies are having to navigate during 2021, but instead because this might be a bigger driver of potential investment success in Chinese equities than we think. In fact, it may not be much more complex than saying that China is more used to having to adapt to change than anywhere else in the world, which means innovation is more effective.
Dychtwald has drawn on World Bank data to create the ‘lived change index’ to track how much economic change a population has experienced, and its calculation uses lifetime per capita GDP as a key input. Over the last 30 years, China registers over 30 times growth on this index, with every other top 40 economy in the world sitting below 10 times growth: the UK and the US are well below 5 times growth. Change has been driven by countless factors, but the CCP’s relentless desire for economic progress is clearly very important. This has led to rapid trial and error in both state and private spheres. As a result the barriers to adopting new products and services are low. Chinese citizens are very willing to try and to trust new technologies.
This is helping to position China as a leader in many areas that could be critical to driving returns over the next decade. 5G is one example. While most other countries have been dithering, China has got on and built more 5G base stations than the rest of the world combined. They are not stopping though, as they already launched a satellite in November 2020 to test airwaves for potential 6G transmissions.1, 2
Social ecommerce is another example. I define this as purchasing where social media, in any form, is the gateway to the transaction. In China, this has grown rapidly, especially as short-form video and blogging have become a critical tool (social media is the internet category that trumps all others for time spent, accounting for about 30 per cent of online hours here in China).3 In other countries, attempts to blend ecommerce with social have been far less successful and are only just starting to catch up. In the US, social ecommerce is expected to reach 4.3 per cent of total online sales in 2021, whereas it is already 13 per cent in China.4
There are countless more examples. In many areas, China has a clear will to embrace new technologies and behaviours. And there is a way. The way is what we try to invest in. For me, this is the crux of the investment case for many Chinese companies – brute force innovation (NOT imitation), coupled with an open-minded potential customer base, used to change. This was put much better by Dychtwald in the Harvard Business Review in May this year, as quoted at the start of this paper.
With this in mind, please forgive my frustration that almost all of the arguments in market commentaries on why you should invest in China seem to be converging to the same main thesis, which is limited. That is, that China is underrepresented in portfolios and benchmarks relative to its importance in the world. It contributes close to 20 per cent of global GDP, more still to GDP growth, yet it is only about 4 per cent of the MSCI ACWI.
To be clear, we’ve used this line argument many times. It is perhaps reasonable as the gist is clear: this feels like an anomaly that should converge. It is inevitably biased though, mainly by the fact that Chinese A shares (domestically listed Chinese companies) are yet to be fully included in investable indices. It can be manipulated very easily by both equity issuance and by index providers, and it is a very passive argument.
For active managers, there is another argument for investing in China, which I think is better. Put simply, there is strong evidence that it’s a great place for stock pickers. That is not only due to the fact the market is particularly short term and inefficient, but more importantly it is home to a significant number of companies with huge return potential, operating against a backdrop where change is normally a positive driver of growth.
To explain this, let’s consider ‘big winners’, defined as companies that can deliver at least 15 per cent per annum return (in US$ terms) over a five-year period.5 We use a global universe of stocks with market caps of over $1bn, and consider each of the five-year periods since 2010.6 Using this data set we have found that China was home to about 17 per cent of global big winners on average for a five-year period. For active portfolios focused on finding the top-returning companies, this shows us quite clearly that China is far too important to ignore. And we can see a scenario where this number continues to rise.
Amid recent news about regulation impacting several Chinese companies, we cannot forget that many of China’s top performers have been world-leading innovators. They have been allowed to flourish at a time when the country has been supportive to national champions due to a clear priority to move towards domestic consumption-led growth. To us, even with more focus on common prosperity, which is likely to be good for the country in the long term, it is not clear that this has changed. Regulation is catching up to innovation in many industries and a new equilibrium is being established. The fact that China has led the world in innovation is one argument for the need for it to lead the world in regulatory terms too. It is dealing with challenges faster than elsewhere.
Digitisation of the economy is still a key priority, and this will create many big winning companies in the process.
As President Xi himself wrote: “We should develop the digital economy and speed up digital industrialisation. We should encourage innovation driven by information technology to create new industries, businesses, and models, and promote development with new growth drivers. We should advance digital transformation… and release the full potential of digitisation in boosting the economy.”
Investors should get used to and be comfortable with the model of progress for China that has both regulation and innovation at its core. For a long-term investor, history would suggest that this actually puts companies on a more sustainable footing than totally unshackled market forces. It is nicely reflected in Angela Merkel’s sentiment that freedom and capitalism are the twin engines of progress, but neither is an absolute good, and both must be moderated to protect the individual. The challenge to us all is that China is now a leader not a follower.
Finding Great Companies
Both for the broader Chinese market as a whole and the big winners therein, we see further reason to believe that China is home to companies with characteristics that should be attractive to stock pickers, particularly those focused on growth. Consider earnings per share (EPS) growth and operating margin (OPM) growth as examples of this. In each of the below charts, we present this data for both a number of indices and for the big winners only.7, 8 We can clearly see that China dominates.
This should all leave us with a feeling of optimism in knowing that there is huge growth potential for Chinese companies and that those with the best growth do offer the best returns. This is set against a backdrop where sheer scale is an incomparable tailwind. This is surely the real case for China?
But if only it were that easy! In order to truly succeed as a long-term investor in China, we would suggest that a very deep understanding of Chinese innovation and future growth trends is required to identify these big winners. This understanding can be helped by building strong long-term relationships with leading Chinese companies and China researchers. To give ourselves the best chance of performing as our clients expect us to, we must blend the strength of such relationships with a tried and tested investment approach.
For us, this has always been about looking for companies that have a sizeable growth opportunity and the means to execute on this, where we can argue that the potential is yet to be reflected in the price. Thinking out five years and beyond is increasingly rare in a China context, so we have a great opportunity to be genuinely different in our approach to finding these winning companies.
By building portfolios with low levels of turnover, by not getting bogged down in the quarterly earnings merry-go-round, and by exploiting terrific market inefficiencies, particularly in the A share market, we believe we can provide a very helpful solution to the China opportunity.
5 This equates to around a doubling over five years and this is in fact the minimum return hurdle for our China-focused portfolios
6 Using annual data frequency: 2010-2015, 2011-2016 etc, up to 2015-2020
7 Data going back to the five years ended December 2000, using rolling five-year periods, with annual data frequency
8 The most recent period has been presented: 2015-2020
The views expressed in this article are those of Andrew Keiller and should not be considered as advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a particular investment. They reflect personal opinion and should not be taken as statements of fact nor should any reliance be placed on them when making investment decisions.
This communication was produced and approved in November 2021 and has not been updated subsequently. It represents views held at the time of writing and may not reflect current thinking.
Potential for Profit and Loss
Any stock examples and images used in this article are not intended to represent recommendations to buy or sell, neither is it implied that they will prove profitable in the future. It is not known whether they will feature in any future portfolio produced by us. Any individual examples will represent only a small part of the overall portfolio and are inserted purely to help illustrate our investment style.
This article contains information on investments which does not constitute independent research. Accordingly, it is not subject to the protections afforded to independent research, but is classified as advertising under Art 68 of the Financial Services Act (‘FinSA’) and Baillie Gifford and its staff may have dealt in the investments concerned.
All information is sourced from Baillie Gifford & Co and is current unless otherwise stated.
The images used in this article are for illustrative purposes only.
Baillie Gifford & Co and Baillie Gifford & Co Limited are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Baillie Gifford & Co Limited is an Authorised Corporate Director of OEICs.
Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited provides investment management and advisory services to non-UK Professional/Institutional clients only. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford & Co. Baillie Gifford & Co and Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited are authorised and regulated by the FCA in the UK.
Persons resident or domiciled outside the UK should consult with their professional advisers as to whether they require any governmental or other consents in order to enable them to invest, and with their tax advisers for advice relevant to their own particular circumstances.
This document is suitable for use of financial intermediaries. Financial intermediaries are solely responsible for any further distribution and Baillie Gifford takes no responsibility for the reliance on this document by any other person who did not receive this document directly from Baillie Gifford.
Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited provides investment management and advisory services to European (excluding UK) clients. It was incorporated in Ireland in May 2018 and is authorised by the Central Bank of Ireland. Through its MiFID passport, it has established Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited (Frankfurt Branch) to market its investment management and advisory services and distribute Baillie Gifford Worldwide Funds plc in Germany. Similarly, it has established Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited (Amsterdam Branch) to market its investment management and advisory services and distribute Baillie Gifford Worldwide Funds plc in The Netherlands. Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited also has a representative office in Zurich, Switzerland pursuant to Art. 58 of the Federal Act on Financial Institutions ("FinIA"). It does not constitute a branch and therefore does not have authority to commit Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited. It is the intention to ask for the authorisation by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) to maintain this representative office of a foreign asset manager of collective assets in Switzerland pursuant to the applicable transitional provisions of FinIA. Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited, which is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford & Co.
Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Shanghai) Limited
柏基投资管理(上海)有限公司(‘BGIMS’) is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited and may provide investment research to the Baillie Gifford Group pursuant to applicable laws. BGIMS is incorporated in Shanghai in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’) as a wholly foreign-owned limited liability company with a unified social credit code of 91310000MA1FL6KQ30. BGIMS is a registered Private Fund Manager with the Asset Management Association of China (‘AMAC’) and manages private security investment fund in the PRC, with a registration code of P1071226.
Baillie Gifford Overseas Investment Fund Management (Shanghai) Limited
柏基海外投资基金管理(上海)有限公司(‘BGQS’) is a wholly owned subsidiary of BGIMS incorporated in Shanghai as a limited liability company with its unified social credit code of 91310000MA1FL7JFXQ. BGQS is a registered Private Fund Manager with AMAC with a registration code of P1071708. BGQS has been approved by Shanghai Municipal Financial Regulatory Bureau for the Qualified Domestic Limited Partners (QDLP) Pilot Program, under which it may raise funds from PRC investors for making overseas investments.
Baillie Gifford Asia (Hong Kong) Limited 柏基亞洲(香港)有限公司 is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited and holds a Type 1 and a Type 2 license from the Securities & Futures Commission of Hong Kong to market and distribute Baillie Gifford’s range of collective investment schemes to professional investors in Hong Kong. Baillie Gifford Asia (Hong Kong) Limited 柏基亞洲(香港)有限公司 can be contacted at Suites 2713-2715, Two International Finance Centre, 8 Finance Street, Central, Hong Kong. Telephone +852 3756 5700.
Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is licensed with the Financial Services Commission in South Korea as a cross border Discretionary Investment Manager and Non-discretionary Investment Adviser.
Mitsubishi UFJ Baillie Gifford Asset Management Limited (‘MUBGAM’) is a joint venture company between Mitsubishi UFJ Trust & Banking Corporation and Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited. MUBGAM is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited (ARBN 118 567 178) is registered as a foreign company under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and holds Foreign Australian Financial Services Licence No 528911. This material is provided to you on the basis that you are a “wholesale client” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (“Corporations Act”). Please advise Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited immediately if you are not a wholesale client. In no circumstances may this material be made available to a “retail client” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act.
This material contains general information only. It does not take into account any person’s objectives, financial situation or needs.
Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is registered as a Foreign Financial Services Provider with the Financial Sector Conduct Authority in South Africa.
Baillie Gifford International LLC is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited; it was formed in Delaware in 2005 and is registered with the SEC. It is the legal entity through which Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited provides client service and marketing functions in North America. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is registered with the SEC in the United States of America.
The Manager is not resident in Canada, its head office and principal place of business is in Edinburgh, Scotland. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is regulated in Canada as a portfolio manager and exempt market dealer with the Ontario Securities Commission ('OSC'). Its portfolio manager licence is currently passported into Alberta, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Newfoundland & Labrador whereas the exempt market dealer licence is passported across all Canadian provinces and territories. Baillie Gifford International LLC is regulated by the OSC as an exempt market and its licence is passported across all Canadian provinces and territories. Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited (‘BGE’) relies on the International Investment Fund Manager Exemption in the provinces of Ontario and Quebec.
Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited (“BGO”) neither has a registered business presence nor a representative office in Oman and does not undertake banking business or provide financial services in Oman. Consequently, BGO is not regulated by either the Central Bank of Oman or Oman’s Capital Market Authority. No authorization, licence or approval has been received from the Capital Market Authority of Oman or any other regulatory authority in Oman, to provide such advice or service within Oman. BGO does not solicit business in Oman and does not market, offer, sell or distribute any financial or investment products or services in Oman and no subscription to any securities, products or financial services may or will be consummated within Oman. The recipient of this material represents that it is a financial institution or a sophisticated investor (as described in Article 139 of the Executive Regulations of the Capital Market Law) and that its officers/employees have such experience in business and financial matters that they are capable of evaluating the merits and risks of investments.
The materials contained herein are not intended to constitute an offer or provision of investment management, investment and advisory services or other financial services under the laws of Qatar. The services have not been and will not be authorised by the Qatar Financial Markets Authority, the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority or the Qatar Central Bank in accordance with their regulations or any other regulations in Qatar.
Baillie Gifford Overseas is not licensed under Israel’s Regulation of Investment Advising, Investment Marketing and Portfolio Management Law, 5755-1995 (the Advice Law) and does not carry insurance pursuant to the Advice Law. This material is only intended for those categories of Israeli residents who are qualified clients listed on the First Addendum to the Advice Law.