Investors should carefully consider the objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the fund before investing. This information and other information about the Fund can be found in the prospectus and summary prospectus. For a prospectus or summary prospectus please visit our website at https://usmutualfund.bailliegifford.com. Please carefully read the Fundís prospectus and related documents before investing. Securities are offered through Baillie Gifford Funds Services LLC, an affiliate of Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited and a member of FINRA.
We are not alone. One of the notable recent trends in our industry is the rising focus of environmental, societal and governance (ESG) issues. However, it can sometimes seem that the intent to do good is lost in translation, because there are no agreed principles as to what ESG investing should involve or indeed what it is it should be trying to achieve. Investors and their end clients consider ESG for a wide range of reasons and hence place it higher or lower on their list of investment priorities. Reflecting this diversity of emphasis, it follows that there are various terms floating around to describe these approaches. The problem is that the terms – socially responsible investing, impact investing, ethical investing, to name but a few – are being used interchangeably. As a result, it is not always clear to the end client what it is that they are subscribing to and, therefore, what they should be expecting to get from investing in this manner.
Our approach to ESG is simple. As investors in the International Smaller Companies team, we believe that assessing companies on ESG considerations ultimately helps us to invest better. That we are also hopefully ‘doing the right thing’ by doing so is of course important to us, but we recognise that it is inevitably subjective and are keen to emphasise that this is not our starting point. Our mandate is to invest and generate meaningful investment returns over the long term for our clients.
Our impression is that despite mounting evidence, the assertion that ESG considerations are returns-enhancing remains needlessly contentious – particularly in relation to the E (Environmental) and S (Societal) within ESG. My colleague, Milena Mileva, will cover Governance when we take a closer look at another spoke in the Radar, Alignment. Here we focus on the E and the S, or perhaps more intuitively, how a company deals with its stakeholders (we use this term in a general sense to cover not just employees, creditors and shareholders, but also the entire supply chain which the company is part of); and how this company contributes to and/or impacts the broader society. Environmental concerns should be considered an important subset of this, but for the main part, the paper addresses the wider issue of sustainability.
A company’s approach on sustainability matters may well be the most powerful indicator there is of a company’s quality and its culture. A management team that thinks deeply about its company’s role within society and its interactions with its stakeholders will be naturally long-term orientated (just as we are at Baillie Gifford); whereas lesser executives, sometimes through an excessive focus on specific targets (usually financial), often compromise the longer-term robustness and development of the company in one way or another. There are endless examples of companies failing to invest in promising opportunities because of the shorter-term hit to profits that would ensue, and of companies that encounter serious operational issues because they have neglected the interests of one or other stakeholder groups. Industrial actions, regulatory clamp-downs/controls, supply chain disruptions, customer backlash, mass data leaks and so on, do not happen purely by accident. What goes around, comes around.
One way to view sustainability considerations, therefore, is to see it as a proactive risk management tool that works on an individual stock level. Companies that are run sustainably, in a broad sense of the word as applied here, are less prone to ‘going wrong’, all else being equal. But this would be massively understating the significance of sustainability – for many companies in our portfolio, the relationship with sustainability runs far deeper than just reducing risk.
From our point of view, researching smaller companies, studying a company’s philosophy and policies on sustainability is often particularly revealing. The relative lack of resources means that many simply don’t have specialist teams to implement comprehensive ESG ‘best practises’ or shout about these policies through glossy publications – and nor do we necessarily want to encourage our investee companies to do so. What a company chooses to do tells us a lot about who they really are and what really matters. The importance of this is exacerbated because information for smaller companies is often less readily available – a challenge that we face across all aspects of small cap investing – and understanding the underlying viewpoint of the company’s management is therefore crucial.
Consider the following quote, courtesy of Brunello Cucinelli – the eponymous founder of the Italian luxury company best known for cashmere knitwear:
I believe in a humanistic enterprise: business should comply in the noblest manner with all the rules of ethics that man has devised over the centuries. I dream about a form of humanistic modern capitalism with strong ancient roots, where profit is made without harm or offence to anyone, and part of it is set aside for any initiative that can really improve the condition of human life: services, schools, places of worship and cultural heritage. In my organization the focal point is the common good, which is the guiding force in pursuing prudent and courageous actions. In my business, people are at the very center of every production process, because I am convinced that human dignity is restored solely through the rediscovery of the conscience. Work elevates human dignity and the emotional ties that derive from it.
© Sandro Michahelles/Sintes/Sipa/REX/Shutterstock
Our research suggests that his company practises what Cucinelli preaches. Employees are treated well – there is a very strong emphasis on work-life balance (e.g. a no-email policy after 5.30pm!) and staff enjoy salaries significantly above the industry average, among other perks. Solomeo, a hilltop medieval hamlet in rural Umbria where Brunello Cucinelli is now headquartered, has largely been renovated from Cucinelli’s philanthropy over the past 30 years. Sure, these policies help boost staff morale, which in turn benefits the company. But this is also the essence of the brand upon which the business is built upon. Customers aren’t just paying for the cashmere, but also the ethos of the company.
For other companies, sustainability provides direct business opportunities. Katitas, a Japanese housebuilder, has a business model that involves buying derelict homes, and selling them after refurbishment. It may not seem like a revolutionary idea, but it is unusual in a market dominated by new builds, where houses are typically knocked down after two or three decades. Katitas’s opportunity is therefore sizeable. It directly addresses Japan’s chronic housing shortage by providing affordable, good quality homes, often helping to revitalise local communities in decline in the process.
The last example that I would like to highlight is FDM, a British company that provides IT and business consultants to a range of client companies. On the face of it, it is an IT staffing company. However, FDM not only recruits its consultants (known as ‘Mounties’) from a much wider variety of backgrounds than is the norm for the industry, but it also puts them through its own two-year IT training programme. This includes those with non-technical university degrees, ex-military personnel and those returning to work. FDM’s contribution and support towards social mobility as well as women in tech (a zero gender pay gap and circa 50% female in senior management) are particularly noteworthy. Is this altruistic? Not completely – FDM’s positioning plainly makes business sense. Qualified IT professionals are in short supply, the company’s established ‘Mounties model’ taps into relatively under-explored talent pools and it helps guarantee a supply of consultants. It ultimately allows the company to scale into a vast, exciting market opportunity.
Having articulated why sustainability is an important investment factor, just as assessing a company’s market opportunity and competitive edge are, it follows to ask how we incorporate sustainability considerations into the International Smaller Companies’ investment process.
Despite assigning each company a score against sustainability, as we do for all six factors on our Radar framework, this does not reflect a quantitative measurement of an individual sustainability marker, or such like. Instead, our aim is to assess sustainability in an integrated and largely qualitative manner based on the unique circumstances and traits of the companies that we are researching, drawing upon specialist help from our own Governance & Sustainability team as required (who will also provide a degree of independent portfolio challenge on a periodic basis). While our methodology may not appear particularly systematic, nor should it be. Each company has its own set of sustainability-related opportunities and challenges. That is why we are sceptical of companies (and rating agencies) that approach ESG with a tick-box mentality.
Another tangible output of our explicit acknowledgement of sustainability as a key investment factor is that it helps us as shareholders to engage with companies. As much as we like to think that our companies are well run and are thoughtful on sustainability matters, many are far from perfect and have significant challenges of their own, whether it is a company specific issue or one that impacts the whole industry. For example, while we admire Brunello Cucinelli’s humanist philosophy, our research on cashmere sourcing also highlighted that the social and ecological impact of cashmere production; and the supply chain, much of it based in Mongolia, may well be vulnerable to sudden environmental changes. As a result, we are engaging directly with the company to understand more about the company’s policies, and as shareholders with a long-term horizon, encourage the company to further improve their approach.
Summing up, what is sustainability to us? The answer is multi-faceted. Sustainability is Opportunity – think Katitas’ market. Sustainability is Edge – think Brunello Cucinelli’s brand. Sustainability is a big part of Alignment. Sustainability helps us understand a company’s potential to Scale – think of FDM’s Mounties model. And for us, sustainability is a powerful source of Insight and a core part of our investment philosophy.
Ultimately, no company operates in isolation. The long-term prospect of each company and its individual array of stakeholders is intertwined in complex and often unpredictable ways. Sustainability is simply a lens through which we try to understand where the opportunities and tensions are in a company’s web of interdependence with the broader society, and what the company is doing about them. Often, it involves an explicit cost to the companies; and benefits that are indirect, uncertain. In a general sense, sustainability is the cultivation of good karma.
This article contains information on investments which does not constitute independent research. Accordingly, it is not subject to the protections afforded to independent research and Baillie Gifford and its staff may have dealt in the investments concerned.
Any stock examples, or images, used in this article are not intended to represent recommendations to buy or sell, neither is it implied that they will prove profitable in the future. It is not known whether they will feature in any future portfolio produced by us. Any individual examples will represent only a small part of the overall portfolio and are inserted purely to help illustrate our investment style.
As with all mutual funds, the value of an investment in the fund could decline, so you could lose money. International investing involves special risks, which include changes in currency rates, foreign taxation and differences in auditing standards and securities regulations, political uncertainty and greater volatility. These risks are even greater when investing in emerging markets. Security prices in emerging markets can be significantly more volatile than in the more developed nations of the world, reflecting the greater uncertainties of investing in less established markets and economies.
Currency risk includes the risk that the foreign currencies in which a fund’s investments are traded, in which a fund receives income, or in which a fund has taken a position, will decline in value relative to the U.S. dollar. Hedging against a decline in the value of currency does not eliminate fluctuations in the prices of portfolio securities or prevent losses if the prices of such securities decline. In addition, hedging a foreign currency can have a negative effect on performance if the U.S. dollar declines in value relative to that currency, or if the currency hedging is otherwise ineffective.
The most significant risks of an investment in the Baillie Gifford International Smaller Companies Fund are Investment Style Risk, Growth Stock Risk, Long-Term Investment Strategy Risk, Geographic Focus Risk, Small-and Medium-Capitalization Securities Risk, Asia Risk, China Risk, Conflicts of Interest Risk, Currency and Currency Hedging Risk, Emerging Markets Risk, Equity Securities Risk, Focused Investment Risk, Information Technology Risk, IPO Risk, Japan Risk, Liquidity Risk, Market Disruption and Geopolitical Risk, Market Risk, New and Smaller-Sized Funds Risk, Non-U.S. Investment Risk, Service Provider Risk, Settlement Risk. For more information about these and other risks of an investment in the fund, see ‘Principal Investment Risks’ and ‘Additional Investment Strategies’ in the prospectus. The Baillie Gifford International Smaller Companies Fund seeks capital appreciation. There can be no assurance, however, that the fund will achieve its investment objective.
The fund is distributed by Baillie Gifford Funds Services LLC. Baillie Gifford Funds Services LLC is registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC, a member of FINRA and is an affiliate of Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited.
Top Ten Holdings as at 31 December 2019
|2.||Douzone Bizon Co||3.37|
|9.||AirTac International Group||2.41|
It should not be assumed that recommendations/transactions made in the future will be profitable or will equal performance of the securities mentioned. A full list of holdings is available on request. The composition of the fund’s holdings is subject to change. Percentages are based on securities at market value.
45832 USM WE 0147
Brian chairs the Portfolio Construction Group for the International Smaller Companies Strategy, a strategy dedicated to investing in the most exceptional smaller companies internationally. Brian graduated MSci and BA (Hons) in Physics from the University of Cambridge in 2006. He joined Baillie Gifford in the same year and initially worked in the North American and Emerging Markets departments, before spending a number of years focussed on investment in smaller companies. Brian is an Investment Manager in our EAFE Alpha Research Team and became a member of the EAFE Alpha Portfolio Construction Group in May 2015. Brian is a CFA charterholder.