Tilting the odds in your favourStephen Corr, Client Service Director
The value of an investment, and any income from it can fall as well as rise and investors may not get back the amount invested. Past performance is not a guide to future returns.
Having been outperformed by US equities over the longer term, the time may now be right for the international asset class to bounce back, as Stephen Corr explains.
Tesla has become the poster child for phenomenal innovation, genius leadership, and exceptional returns. Few remember that Elon Musk struggled to get funding for his project from the capital markets, a fact the writer Michael Lewis reminds us about in The Fifth Risk. It was the US Department of Energy which lent money to Tesla to build its factory in Fremont, California, when the private sector would not. Would Mr Musk have built his factory in South Africa had that government been able to lend money, or China had they been willing to do so? America has long been the leader in putting risk capital to productive work, and having policies and rewards in place to encourage entrepreneurship.
If it seems unusual to start an ‘International’ paper referencing a US company, it is worth remember that in financial markets, it is the rate of change and its direction that dominates, and in this regard, it may be the International market place that has the US in its rear view mirror in the coming decade.
Pick the right markets
The international asset class finds itself under pressure and has been eclipsed in performance terms by US stocks in more recent times. We think it is time to question if this can continue. Our experience in managing international portfolios dates back to the 1980s, but investing overseas is more deeply embedded in our firm’s DNA. Indeed, Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust was founded in 1909 and has been managed by Baillie Gifford for 112 years. We first wrote about the international opportunity set in 2019, and this paper looks to build on that original piece, expanding on some of the arguments highlighted back then, specifically, how the international horizon looks for an active investor over the coming years and why its attraction is growing.
For the purposes of this report, we define our investible universe as stocks with a market capitalisation above $2bn. The universe is summarised below.
Our Investible Universe
$ Value % $ Value No. Stocks % Stocks No. Countries US Market 46,049,264,308,224 45 1909 30 1 International Market 57,384,898,097,152 55 4527 70 82 Total Universe (>$2bn) 103,434,162,405,376 100 6436 100
Source: Bloomberg. As at 31 December 2020.
When we wrote the first iteration of this paper, the dollar value of the US market was higher than the combined international markets. In three short years that situation has now inverted.
Since 1996, the broader universe of US-listed securities has declined from a peak of 8,090, to a 2018 count of 4,397, a 46 per cent drop. Today, there are fewer US-listed companies than in the early 1980s, when the US economy was less than half its current size.
US Listed Companies
Global Listed Companies
Source: World Bank.
There is no such shrinkage in international equity markets. Quite the opposite in fact, with internationally listed businesses growing from 26,432 to 38,945, a 47 per cent increase. For several years, Ernst and Young has tracked global IPO trends. In 2014, its research showed that the Americas accounted for 25 per cent of all new listings and 38 per cent of the proceeds of those. By 2020, the US share had fallen to 21 per cent and the proceeds to 36 per cent, with much more fallow periods in the intervening years.
RECENT IPO ACTIVITY
Selected IPOs by Proceeds
Source: PwC, Ernst & Young, Global IPO Trends, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020. The IPOs selected represent the top three listings by proceed in each quarter between 2016 and 2020. Note: Baillie Gifford does not necessarily hold these companies.
For several years, Hong Kong and China have topped the IPO league table. As the chart below illustrates, we can expect this trend to continue as emerging market companies redressing the imbalance imposed by legacy benchmarks. The link between GDP and market cap is far from linear, but the direction of travel seems clear to us.
US companies are over-represented in global benchmarks
Source: Refinitiv Datastream.
Over the years, the level of interest in US domestic equities versus international equities has waxed and waned, most commonly when one asset class has enjoyed a prolonged period of outperformance. We are at one such juncture today. Taking three-year rolling returns for the S&P 500 and the MSCI EAFE index as our comparative benchmarks, domestic US equities have enjoyed 11 consecutive years of outperformance against international equities. As this is one of the longest periods of relative strength in the past 45 years, it is not surprising that more people are calling for more assets to be allocated domestically. However, after such a lengthy period of outperformance, history tells us this may not be the best time to make that switch.
Three-year rolling returns – S&P 500 vs International Index
Source: Refinitiv Datastream.
Pick the right environment
Favourable policies, capital markets and regulations have given the US a huge advantage over many other parts of the world in recent decades. In the financial environment it is, as always, the pace of change that matters most. As my colleague Chris Davis recently explained, summarised in the following paragraphs, investment beyond US shores is quickly closing the gap.
“The foundations have been laid for European tech to flourish long term as never before. Capital is available in large quantities, increasingly coming from patient, supportive investors who understand the challenges of building tech winners. This powerful combination is fostering a wave of European entrepreneurs ready to take on the world. The past six years alone have witnessed more than a thirteen-fold increase in the amount of equity raised by Europe’s tech ecosystem, a colossal $40bn that dwarves the $3bn raised in 2014. There’s also been a near fourfold increase in the number of European tech unicorns (companies worth more than $1bn) and more than a fourfold increase in the number of companies valued $5bn and above. Even the European Commission has realised the need for money, setting up the European Innovation Council in 2017 with the explicit goal of making approximately €3bn of funding available to ‘the most talented innovators to help their companies scale up and expand beyond European borders”.
Europe’s Transforming Tech Ecosystem
Source: GP Bullhound, Capital IQ, Mergemarket. Pitchbook and Crunchbase. Equity funds raised refer to capital raised through primary equity offering. Cut-off date for inclusion in report 31 March 2020; valuations correct as at 14 May 2020.
What matters most is the transformation in ambitions. The thriving tech ecosystems in various European cities – from Paris to Berlin to Stockholm – have provided nurturing environments that allow entrepreneurs to aim high.
And aiming high they are. Spotify’s Daniel Ek is taking on American giants Apple and Amazon in music streaming. He is winning the battle for subscribers with over 130 million paying subscribers, more than Apple and Amazon combined. Classifieds marketplace operator Adevinta – which runs several real estate, car and job marketplaces around Europe – is about to become the largest in the world as it digests eBay’s classifieds division. Then there’s Jitse Groen, the ambitious founder of Dutch online food delivery business Takeaway.com, which recently merged with the UK’s Just Eat. He is currently in the process of trying to acquire American peer Grubhub, a deal that would crown Just Eat Takeaway as one of the biggest online food delivery businesses in the world.
It may come as a surprise to learn that Tel Aviv (Israel), Vilnius (Lithuania), and Tallinn (Estonia) all rank in the top 50 cities in the world in Fintech. You may not yet have heard of many of their leading companies, but I’ll wager you will in the coming decade. Lithuania ranks number one in the world in terms of broadband speed and in the top five countries for Fintech innovation. Investment in the right infrastructure has given that country a head start it is not wasting.
Access to capital and need for less of it in today’s capital-lite, ‘free money’ world means more and more entrepreneurs, the geniuses who will lead the exceptional companies of tomorrow, no longer feel anchored to the US. 20 years ago, fewer than 15 per cent of Chinese students studying abroad felt compelled to return home, filled with ideas but lacking the capital to fund their ambitions. Today closer to 80 per cent see a much more favourable environment in which to put their western education to profitable use domestically.
Percentage of Chinese Students Studying Abroad and Returning to China
Source: National Bureau of Statistics of China, China Statistic Yearbook 2019. The figure is reproduced from American Academy of Arts and Sciences, The Perils of Complacency: America at a Tipping Point in Science & Engineering (Cambridge, Mass.: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2020).
Adding to the earlier comments on the popularity of the Hong Kong stock market, companies are increasingly eschewing an ADR listing entirely, preferring a Hong Kong local listing, with exchange regulators encouragingly supportive. For the Chinese company of the future, a dual listing may well mean H-shares (HK) and A-shares (mainland China).
In a world obsessed with buybacks (at the wrong time) and cost-cutting (at the wrong time), we look for investment and expansion. Here, the US is no longer the world leader it once was.
Gross Expenditure in R&D
Source: OECD, 2019.
Despite the protestations of politicians garnering votes in the almost unending US election cycle, the American chant ‘we’re number one’ is under pressure on multiple fronts, not just the perceived threat from the rise of China.
Europe’s regulatory regime shift, China’s R&D investment and Lithuanian’s infrastructure investment are but three small examples that show there are confluences of disruption, development, and innovation going on in corners of the world where such activity was previously unimagined. Our job as investors is to find those exceptional companies, purchase them on our clients’ behalf, and hold them in meaningful size above an index weight to generate better than average performance.
Lithuania ranks number 1 in terms of broadband speed.
Pick the right manager
Finding those expectational growth companies is difficult, and it is very hard to outperform over the long term. Indeed, the work of Professor Hendrick Bessembinder at Arizona State University tells us that a tiny fraction of all internationally listed companies – 0.6 per cent, or 259 companies – have generated all the wealth in international markets since 1990. The value created by 27,635 firms was offset by the value destroyed by 16,141 others.
Total wealth created by all listed global stocks between 1990–2018
Source: Bessembinder, H., Cheng, TF., Choi G. and John Wei, K.C. Do Global Stocks Outperform Treasury Bills? (July, 2019). The first author acknowledges financial support from Baillie Gifford & Co. The data includes 61,981 CRSP common stocks from January 1990 to December 2018.
The right manager won’t find the exceptional growth companies of the coming decade by staring at a Bloomberg screen or tuning in to CNBC, and they won’t find it in the consensus. They won’t find it over a week, month or quarter either. The right manager supports the companies they invest client money with, encourages improvement where needed and challenges behaviours they disagree with.
For now, the tsunami of money flowing into (mainly passive) US funds continues unabated. An acceleration of that pattern cannot be ruled out, but the following table is illustrative for those who do believe in active international management. Taking the 10-year column as our example (very few do these days!), the benchmark has returned an annualised 5.4 per cent. A first quartile manager has returned an annualised 9.3 per cent, and the top 5 per cent of managers have returned an annualised 12.7 per cent. Done correctly, truly active management can – and does – outperform. Glib statements that active international managers cannot add value are simply misleading.
ACWI ex US Active Management Universe
3 Years 5 Years 10 Years Baillie Gifford International Alpha 11.8 14.7 9.1 5th Percentile 19.8 19.3 12.7 Median 8.1 11.2 7.6 95th Percentile -1.6 4.3 3.8 MSCI ACWI ex US index 5.4 9.4 5.4
Source: Baillie Gifford and underlying index providers. USD. Net of fees.
Past performance is not a guide to future returns.
The highly respected industry veteran Charlie Munger summarised more succinctly than I can how investors should tilt the odds in their favour when he shared his first rule of fishing; “fish where the fish are”. The opportunity set in international markets continues to expand while the US market shrinks. The environment and regimes for international markets is supportive of emerging businesses. Active managers can add significant value, by doing thorough research and picking the long-term winners.
You will excuse us if some of this commentary seems self-indulgent, but as passionate believers in long-term, active investment management, we think it strange to have to defend the benefits of active international equities. But defend them we must, and defend them we will, for another 112 years if necessary.
Annual Past Performance to 30 June Each Year (%)
Baillie Gifford International Alpha Composite
MSCI ACWI ex US
Annualised returns to 30 June 2021 (%)
Baillie Gifford International Alpha Composite
MSCI ACWI ex US
Source: Baillie Gifford & Co and relevant underlying index provider(s). USD.
Net of fees returns have been calculated by reducing the gross return by the highest annual management fee for the composite.
Past performance is not a guide to future returns.
The views expressed in this article are those of Stephen Corr and should not be considered as advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a particular investment. They reflect personal opinion and should not be taken as statements of fact nor should any reliance be placed on them when making investment decisions.
This communication was produced and approved in April 2021 and has not been updated subsequently. It represents views held at the time of writing and may not reflect current thinking.
Potential for Profit and Loss
All investment strategies have the potential for profit and loss, your or your clients’ capital may be at risk. Past performance is not a guide to future returns.
Any stock examples and images used in this article are not intended to represent recommendations to buy or sell, neither is it implied that they will prove profitable in the future. It is not known whether they will feature in any future portfolio produced by us. Any individual examples will represent only a small part of the overall portfolio and are inserted purely to help illustrate our investment style.
This article contains information on investments which does not constitute independent research. Accordingly, it is not subject to the protections afforded to independent research, but is classified as advertising under Art 68 of the Financial Services Act (‘FinSA’) and Baillie Gifford and its staff may have dealt in the investments concerned.
All information is sourced from Baillie Gifford & Co and is current unless otherwise stated.
The images used in this article are for illustrative purposes only.
Baillie Gifford & Co and Baillie Gifford & Co Limited are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Baillie Gifford & Co Limited is an Authorised Corporate Director of OEICs.
Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited provides investment management and advisory services to non-UK Professional/Institutional clients only. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford & Co. Baillie Gifford & Co and Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited are authorised and regulated by the FCA in the UK.
Persons resident or domiciled outside the UK should consult with their professional advisers as to whether they require any governmental or other consents in order to enable them to invest, and with their tax advisers for advice relevant to their own particular circumstances.
Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited provides investment management and advisory services to European (excluding UK) clients. It was incorporated in Ireland in May 2018 and is authorised by the Central Bank of Ireland. Through its MiFID passport, it has established Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited (Frankfurt Branch) to market its investment management and advisory services and distribute Baillie Gifford Worldwide Funds plc in Germany. Similarly, it has established Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited (Amsterdam Branch) to market its investment management and advisory services and distribute Baillie Gifford Worldwide Funds plc in The Netherlands. Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited also has a representative office in Zurich, Switzerland pursuant to Art. 58 of the Federal Act on Financial Institutions ("FinIA"). It does not constitute a branch and therefore does not have authority to commit Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited. It is the intention to ask for the authorisation by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) to maintain this representative office of a foreign asset manager of collective assets in Switzerland pursuant to the applicable transitional provisions of FinIA. Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited, which is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford & Co.
Baillie Gifford Asia (Hong Kong) Limited
柏基亞洲(香港)有限公司 is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited and holds a Type 1 and a Type 2 license from the Securities & Futures Commission of Hong Kong to market and distribute Baillie Gifford’s range of collective investment schemes to professional investors in Hong Kong. Baillie Gifford Asia (Hong Kong) Limited
柏基亞洲(香港)有限公司 can be contacted at Suites 2713-2715, Two International Finance Centre, 8 Finance Street, Central, Hong Kong. Telephone +852 3756 5700.
Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is licensed with the Financial Services Commission in South Korea as a cross border Discretionary Investment Manager and Non-discretionary Investment Adviser.
Mitsubishi UFJ Baillie Gifford Asset Management Limited (‘MUBGAM’) is a joint venture company between Mitsubishi UFJ Trust & Banking Corporation and Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited. MUBGAM is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited (ARBN 118 567 178) is registered as a foreign company under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and holds Foreign Australian Financial Services Licence No 528911. This material is provided to you on the basis that you are a “wholesale client” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (“Corporations Act”). Please advise Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited immediately if you are not a wholesale client. In no circumstances may this material be made available to a “retail client” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act.
This material contains general information only. It does not take into account any person’s objectives, financial situation or needs.
Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is registered as a Foreign Financial Services Provider with the Financial Sector Conduct Authority in South Africa.
Baillie Gifford International LLC is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited; it was formed in Delaware in 2005 and is registered with the SEC. It is the legal entity through which Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited provides client service and marketing functions in North America. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is registered with the SEC in the United States of America.
The Manager is not resident in Canada, its head office and principal place of business is in Edinburgh, Scotland. Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited is regulated in Canada as a portfolio manager and exempt market dealer with the Ontario Securities Commission ('OSC'). Its portfolio manager licence is currently passported into Alberta, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Newfoundland & Labrador whereas the exempt market dealer licence is passported across all Canadian provinces and territories. Baillie Gifford International LLC is regulated by the OSC as an exempt market and its licence is passported across all Canadian provinces and territories. Baillie Gifford Investment Management (Europe) Limited (‘BGE’) relies on the International Investment Fund Manager Exemption in the provinces of Ontario and Quebec.
Baillie Gifford Overseas Limited (“BGO”) neither has a registered business presence nor a representative office in Oman and does not undertake banking business or provide financial services in Oman. Consequently, BGO is not regulated by either the Central Bank of Oman or Oman’s Capital Market Authority. No authorization, licence or approval has been received from the Capital Market Authority of Oman or any other regulatory authority in Oman, to provide such advice or service within Oman. BGO does not solicit business in Oman and does not market, offer, sell or distribute any financial or investment products or services in Oman and no subscription to any securities, products or financial services may or will be consummated within Oman. The recipient of this material represents that it is a financial institution or a sophisticated investor (as described in Article 139 of the Executive Regulations of the Capital Market Law) and that its officers/employees have such experience in business and financial matters that they are capable of evaluating the merits and risks of investments.
The materials contained herein are not intended to constitute an offer or provision of investment management, investment and advisory services or other financial services under the laws of Qatar. The services have not been and will not be authorised by the Qatar Financial Markets Authority, the Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority or the Qatar Central Bank in accordance with their regulations or any other regulations in Qatar.
Baillie Gifford Overseas is not licensed under Israel’s Regulation of Investment Advising, Investment Marketing and Portfolio Management Law, 5755-1995 (the Advice Law) and does not carry insurance pursuant to the Advice Law. This material is only intended for those categories of Israeli residents who are qualified clients listed on the First Addendum to the Advice Law.
MSCI Legal Disclaimer
Source: MSCI. MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indexes or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, endorsed, reviewed or produced by MSCI. None of the MSCI data is intended to constitute investment advice or a recommendation to make (or refrain from making) any kind of investment decision and may not be relied on as such.
S&P Legal Disclaimer
Source: The S&P 500 (‘Index’) is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P Global, or its affiliates (‘SPDJI’). Standard & Poor’s® and S&P® are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC, a division of S&P Global (‘S&P’); Dow Jones® is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC (‘Dow Jones’). Neither S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC, their affiliates nor their third party licensors make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the ability of any index to accurately represent the asset class or market sector that it purports to represent and neither S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC, their affiliates nor their third party licensors shall have any liability for any errors, omissions, or interruptions of any index or the data included therein.
53644 INS WE 0789
Stephen Corr Client Service Director
Stephen graduated from Dublin City University with a Bachelor of Business Studies (BBS) in 1998 and became a CFA charterholder in 2003. He spent 16 years as a Global, ACWI and EAFE portfolio manager with Blackrock, Scottish Widows Investment Partnership and most recently Nikko Asset Management. Stephen joined the Clients Department at Baillie Gifford in 2016, where he is Client Service Director within the ACWI Alpha Team.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKEInsights.Visit Baillie Gifford's Insights page.Health Innovation: Taking impact and ESG into account.Why the forthcoming Health Innovation Impact Strategy should focus minds.Being Different.Global Stewardship offers a differentiated global equity portfolio, consisting of both Local Heroes and Global Champions. Mike Gush explains why this makes them different.Facing the Future.Investment managers Lawrence Burns and Paulina Sliwinska share thoughts on future trends with Professor Brian Arthur.